kraabel

Rosser Reeves was a pivotal figure in the advertising world whose contributions significantly shaped the mid-20th-century advertising industry and laid foundational principles that continue to influence marketing and branding today. Reeves is best known for developing the Unique Selling Proposition (USP) concept.

Reeves joined the Ted Bates & Co. advertising agency in 1940, eventually rising to vice chairman. Here, he honed and applied his theories on advertising effectiveness, leading campaigns that are remembered for their simplicity, directness, and measurable results. He also inspired much of the Don Draper character from Mad Men.

Unique Selling Proposition (USP)

Reeves is best known for developing the Unique Selling Proposition (USP) concept. He argued that successful advertising campaigns must highlight a unique aspect of the product that makes it superior to competitors and compels consumers to choose it over others. This idea was revolutionary at the time and contrasted with the more common practice of producing ads that focused on creativity and entertainment value without a clear, unique message about the product itself.

Its foundational premise is that successful advertising campaigns must clearly articulate a unique benefit to the consumer that competitors do not offer. This singular focus on differentiating a product or service based on a distinctive attribute or benefit has profound implications for how companies approach marketing and brand positioning. Analyzing why the USP concept worked at its inception and its continued relevance today offers insights into the enduring principles of effective marketing.

Reeves believed in the power of the USP to drive consumer choice by making a clear, compelling case for the product. This is a philosophy grounded in the idea that consumers make decisions based on discernible, rational benefits. The USP, therefore, must be demonstrably true and relevant to the consumer, offering a logical reason to choose one product over another.

Contrasting with the USP, brand image is about the emotional resonance a brand has with its audience. It encompasses the feelings, attitudes, and perceptions that consumers associate with a brand, developed over time through experiences and marketing communications. Brand image is not about claims regarding specific product features but about cultivating a broader, emotional relationship with the consumer.

Reeves acknowledged that while the USP appeals to the consumer’s rational side, brand image engages their emotions, aspirations, and values. This is a more intangible approach, aiming to connect with consumers on a deeper level, beyond the mere functional benefits of a product. Brand image is about how a brand fits into the consumer’s lifestyle, self-image, and worldview.

While Reeves’ distinction between the USP and brand image might seem to suggest two separate paths, modern marketing strategies often seek to integrate these aspects. Today’s marketers understand that consumers are influenced by both rational arguments (the clear benefits highlighted by the USP) and emotional connections (the feelings and associations evoked by the brand image).

The most successful brands are those that manage to articulate a clear USP while also cultivating a strong, positive brand image. They communicate not only what their product can do uniquely well but also how it makes consumers feel, aligning with their desires, values, and aspirations. This integrated approach ensures that brands can connect with consumers on multiple levels, making both rational and emotional appeals to influence decision-making.

Reeves’ insight into the dual nature of consumer engagement — through both claim and feeling — remains a fundamental principle in advertising and marketing. It underscores the complexity of consumer behavior and the need for brands to address both the logical and emotional dimensions of consumer choice in their strategies.

Historical Context and Initial Success

When Rosser Reeves first introduced the USP concept, the advertising industry was just starting to mature, with television becoming a dominant medium alongside radio and print. During this era, the market witnessed a proliferation of products, many of which appeared similar to consumers. The USP concept emerged as a solution to this clutter, providing a clear framework for distinguishing a product from its competitors in a crowded marketplace.

Reeves’ approach was revolutionary because it shifted the focus from the product itself to the benefit it offered to the consumer. This was a departure from the prevailing practice of promoting products based on features or price alone. The USP concept emphasized the importance of a unique benefit — a compelling reason for a consumer to choose one product over another. This clarity not only helped consumers make informed decisions but also allowed companies to focus their marketing efforts on highlighting their product’s distinctive advantages.

Famous Quotes

“I know that at least half of my advertising money is being wasted.  My problem is – I do not know which half.” – Reeves

Why the USP Worked

Clarity and Simplicity: The USP provides a straightforward and memorable message that communicates the essence of what makes a product unique. This simplicity makes it easier for consumers to understand and remember the product, enhancing recall and recognition.

Differentiation: In competitive markets, differentiation is key to standing out. The USP framework forces businesses to identify and communicate what makes their offering unique, providing a clear reason for consumers to prefer their product over others.

Value Proposition: The USP goes beyond mere features to emphasize the benefit or value that the product delivers to the consumer. This focus on value resonates with consumers, driving purchase decisions.

Continued Relevance of the USP

The principles behind the USP remain as relevant today as they were in Reeves’ time, despite the profound changes in the marketing landscape. The explosion of digital media and the advent of social media have dramatically increased the number of touchpoints between brands and consumers, yet the challenge of differentiating one’s offering in a saturated market persists.

Consumer Decision-Making: Modern consumers are inundated with choices, making the clarity provided by a well-articulated USP more crucial than ever. A compelling USP can cut through the noise, guiding consumers towards a product.

Brand Identity and Consistency: The USP is integral to building a strong brand identity. It ensures consistency across various marketing channels, reinforcing the brand’s unique position in the consumer’s mind over time.

Adaptability and Innovation: Today’s fast-paced market dynamics require brands to continually innovate and adapt. The USP concept encourages brands to evolve their unique benefits in response to changing consumer needs and competitive landscapes, ensuring ongoing relevance.

Increased Focus on Consumer Benefits: Modern marketing emphasizes storytelling and consumer benefits. The USP aligns with this focus by compelling brands to articulate how their products improve consumers’ lives uniquely.

The USP concept’s enduring viability lies in its fundamental insight: that successful marketing is not just about what a product is, but what it does for the customer that no other product can. This focus on clear, compelling differentiation based on consumer benefits is timeless. As markets evolve and new channels emerge, the need to stand out based on unique value remains constant. Thus, the USP continues to be a vital tool in the marketer’s arsenal, guiding the development of marketing strategies that resonate with consumers and drive brand success.

The “Reality in Advertising” and Contributions to Marketing Theory

In 1961, Reeves published “Reality in Advertising,” where he elaborated on his advertising philosophy, including the USP, and presented case studies of successful campaigns. This book remains a seminal work in advertising literature, offering insights into Reeves’ emphasis on clarity, consistency, and the importance of a product’s unique features in advertising.

M&M’s and Colgate: Applying the USP

Reeves was instrumental in several iconic advertising campaigns that perfectly illustrated his USP concept. For instance, he created the M&M’s “Melts in your mouth, not in your hands” slogan, which succinctly communicated a unique benefit of the candy. Similarly, his work for Colgate toothpaste highlighted a specific feature (cleaner breath and fewer cavities) that differentiated it from competitors, proving the effectiveness of the USP in real-world advertising.

Legacy and Influence

Rosser Reeves’ influence extends beyond the campaigns he created. His insistence on measurable results and advertising that prioritized clear, consumer-relevant benefits over creativity for its own sake was somewhat controversial but undeniably impactful. He is credited with paving the way for a more analytical approach to advertising that values the proposition’s distinctiveness and directness to the consumer.

His work demonstrated that successful advertising does not just happen by accident; it is the result of careful planning, understanding of consumer behavior, and the ability to distill a product’s essence into a compelling, unique selling proposition. Reeves’ legacy is not just in the campaigns he led or the profits he generated for clients but in his enduring influence on the principles of advertising and marketing strategy.

Rosser Reeves passed away on January 24, 1984, but his contributions to the field of advertising remain relevant, informing strategies and guiding the development of marketing and branding theories well into the 21st century.

Concept At A Glance:

Concept: Unique Selling Proposition (USP)

Introduced by: Rosser Reeves in the 1940s.

Core Concept: The USP is a marketing concept that emphasizes the importance of a distinct and compelling reason why a product or service is superior to and different from those of the competition. It’s about identifying and communicating a feature that makes a brand or product uniquely valuable to consumers.

Reeves, an advertising executive, introduced the USP concept in the mid-20th century, and it was detailed in his book “Reality in Advertising” published in 1961. While not a “brand model” in the contemporary sense, the USP concept laid the groundwork for future brand positioning and differentiation strategies by stressing the importance of a clear, distinct message that sets a brand apart in the marketplace.

This principle has influenced numerous brand models and marketing strategies, making it a foundational element in the development of branding as a discipline. Its focus on differentiation, a core aspect of modern branding, underscores its significance and makes the USP concept a precursor to more complex brand models that followed.

We are beginning a new era in branding, and the call for a revamped framework is loud and clear. A new model centered around the customer journey, emotional connections, shared values, and adaptability is not merely a strategy but a philosophy that can drive brands to new levels of relevance and success.

By reevaluating our branding approach and adopting this holistic, journey-centric approach, we can forge deeper, more meaningful relationships with our customers, paving the way for mutual growth and success. Consumer preferences shift like sand, and markets evolve at lightning speed, so traditional branding frameworks are being challenged to show how they can work in today’s marketing world. The quintessential approach to branding, which primarily focuses on the product and company-centric metrics, is no longer sufficient. This calls for a significant change in approach—re-evaluating how we perceive and implement branding strategies. The new framework must place the customer at the heart of branding and emphasize the shared journey brands undertake with their customers.

For the purposes of this thought experiment, we will call this new model The Brand Voyager Model (BVM).

The Limitations of Traditional Branding

Over the past 50 years, thought leaders in marketing and branding have developed various brand models, each introducing unique perspectives and methodologies to brand building and management. These models have successfully guided countless companies in creating, positioning, and evolving their brands. Many of them have inspired my work over the years, as well. While there is nothing fundamentally wrong with these branding approaches, it is important to evolve our thinking to adapt to changing customer needs and abilities.

Traditional branding has often been about creating a strong, memorable identity and unique value proposition, coupled with consistent messaging across all platforms. While these elements remain critical, this approach can overlook the often spirited nature of customer relationships. Old models often treat a brand as a static entity rather than an evolving relationship between it and its customers. Conventional ways can fall short in today’s landscape, where customer empowerment and engagement hold unprecedented importance.

Companies often treat brand positioning as a set-it-and-forget-it element of their strategy, taking on branding exercises sporadically, perhaps during times of significant organizational change, often including high employee turnover. These infrequent refreshes—encompassing foundational workshops, strategy documents, and identity revamps—tend to fade from collective memory over time.  New team members are brought in and want to make their mark on the company. The result is that any good work previously developed is likely to be pitched in the bin.

The vital elements established during these exercises, meant to guide the brand’s voice, vision, and customer engagement strategies, often gather dust in forgotten corners of the company’s digital archives. This approach neglects the changing nature of markets, consumer preferences, and competitive landscapes, all of which can shift dramatically in short periods. Consequently, there’s a pressing need for a new model that champions the continuous evaluation and evolution of brand positioning.

Such a model would ensure that a brand remains relevant and resonant with its target audience and that every member of the organization is aligned with the brand’s core values and strategic direction. Emphasizing adaptability and engagement, this approach would keep the brand vibrant and aligned with both internal values and external market demands, ensuring long-term success and coherence in an ever-changing business environment.

Customer-Centricity as the Core of a New Framework

At the heart of a new branding framework lies customer-centricity—an ethos that places the customer’s needs, experiences, and values as the primary focus of all branding efforts. This perspective recognizes that the value of a brand is not just in its product or service but in the experience it offers and the emotional connection it fosters with its customers. A customer-centric approach demands a deep understanding of the customer’s journey, from awareness and consideration to purchase and beyond, ensuring that every touchpoint is an opportunity to strengthen the relationship.

Brand models often diverge in their starting points and core focuses, creating a fundamental distinction in how they approach brand strategy and development. Traditional models, including Simon Sinek’s widely acclaimed “Start With Why,” emphasize beginning with a company’s internal aspects—its purpose, values, and the “why” behind its existence. This approach centers on articulating a compelling reason that resonates internally and is projected outwardly, aiming to align the company’s core beliefs with its customers.

Contrastingly, The Brand Voyager model shifts the focus outward from the onset, starting with the customer’s values and reasons for seeking solutions. It prioritizes understanding the “Why” from the customer’s perspective—why they are searching for a solution and what emotional or practical/rational needs drive their behaviors. This customer-centric approach seeks to align the brand’s offerings and communications with the existing values and desires of the customer rather than starting with an internal manifesto of purpose and trying to find customers who align with it. This shift represents a significant evolution in branding philosophy, moving from a company-outward to a customer-inward perspective, ensuring that the brand’s strategies and narratives are deeply rooted in the real needs and aspirations of its audience.

Emphasizing the Shared Journey

The evolution of the digital landscape has blurred the lines between businesses and consumers, making interactions more frequent, personalized, and direct. This has transformed the customer journey into a more complex, non-linear path, where the traditional funnel model no longer applies. Acknowledging this complexity, the new branding framework views the customer journey not as a series of transactions but as a continuous, shared journey that evolves over time.

This journey-centric approach emphasizes the importance of listening to and learning from customers at every stage, adapting and responding to their changing needs and preferences. It’s about creating a dialogue, where feedback loops are encouraged and integral to shaping the brand and its offerings. Brands that excel in this model treat customers as passive recipients and active participants in the brand’s evolution.

Building on Emotional Connections and Values

Another cornerstone of the new framework is the emphasis on building emotional connections and aligning with customers’ values. Customers are bombarded with choices; emotional connections can make a brand stand out. These connections are forged through shared values, authentic storytelling, and experiences that resonate on a personal level.

By aligning a brand’s values with those of its customers, companies can create a sense of community and belonging that go beyond the transactional nature of business. This alignment not only attracts customers but also turns them into loyal advocates for the brand.

While originating from different perspectives, Simon Sinek’s “Start With Why” and the Brand Voyager Model can be seen as complementary approaches within the broader context of strategic branding. The synergy between these models lies in their collective emphasis on understanding and articulating the core motivations driving both the company and its customers.

Here’s how Sinek’s model complements the Brand Voyager Model, creating a holistic branding strategy:

Starting with “Why” from Within

Sinek’s model urges companies to focus on their raison d’être—identifying the purpose, cause, or belief that inspires them to do what they do. This internal exploration helps companies establish a clear, compelling brand identity grounded in authentic values and beliefs. It’s about inspiring people to act because they resonate with the brand’s foundational “Why.”

Extending the “Why” to Customer Motivation

Where Sinek encourages companies to start with their internal “Why,” the Brand Voyager Model takes the next logical step by aligning this internal purpose with the external motivations of customers. It shifts the focus to understanding why prospective customers are seeking solutions in the first place—what are their needs, desires, and the values that drive their decisions? This model ensures that the brand possesses a strong internal purpose and meets the customers where they are, addressing their motivations and aspirations.

Creating a Mutual Connection

By synthesizing the insights from both models, brands can foster a powerful connection that resonates on a deeper level with their audience. Sinek’s model ensures the brand’s messaging and actions are authentic and purpose-driven, while the Brand Voyager Model guarantees these efforts are relevant and responsive to customer needs. This dual approach ensures that the brand’s core purpose aligns with the customer’s values and aspirations, creating a mutual connection that is both meaningful and impactful.

Ensuring Relevance and Resonance

Together, these models create a holistic branding strategy that ensures relevance and resonance. By starting with a strong internal “Why” and extending this purpose to meet the customer’s “Why,” brands can remain agile and responsive. This alignment not only attracts customers but also fosters loyalty, as people are more likely to stay engaged with brands that reflect their values and offer solutions that resonate with their personal motivations.

The Need for Adaptability and Innovation

Finally, the new branding framework acknowledges the need for adaptability and innovation. Brands must be agile, ready to pivot their strategies based on customer feedback and emerging trends. This agility is not just about keeping pace but about anticipating changes and being proactive in offering solutions that meet the evolving needs of customers.

By re-evaluating the way we look at branding and adopting this holistic, journey-centric approach, we can forge deeper, more meaningful relationships with our customers, paving the way for mutual growth and success in the ever-evolving marketplace.

Each of these books offers unique insights into the complexities of brand marketing. From understanding how to communicate effectively with your audience to leveraging the latest in digital marketing strategies, these reads cover the essential knowledge and skills needed to build and sustain powerful brands.

These titles, spanning several decades, reflect the dynamic nature of brand marketing, incorporating foundational theories, contemporary strategies, and future outlooks. They collectively offer brand marketers a well-rounded understanding of how to navigate the evolving marketplace, build meaningful connections with consumers, and achieve lasting brand success.

1. “Building A StoryBrand” by Donald Miller: This book revolutionizes the way marketers think about brand messaging. Miller introduces the StoryBrand framework, which uses the principles of storytelling to clarify your brand’s message, ensuring it resonates with customers and compels them to action.
2. “Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind” by Al Ries and Jack Trout: A seminal work in marketing, this book introduces the concept of positioning — how to be seen and remembered by customers. It’s a critical read for understanding how to stand out in a crowded marketplace.
3. “This is Marketing: You Can’t Be Seen Until You Learn to See” by Seth Godin: Godin challenges traditional marketing tactics and focuses on marketing that is ethical, generous, and targeted toward creating change and making connections. It’s a must-read for modern marketers who want to make an impact.
4. “The Brand Gap” by Marty Neumeier: This book bridges the gap between business strategy and design, arguing that brand is the way to stand out, attract customer loyalty, and create an emotional connection. Neumeier’s insights are crucial for marketers looking to understand the holistic nature of branding.
5. “Contagious: How to Build Word of Mouth in the Digital Age” by Jonah Berger: Berger explores why certain things go viral and how marketers can craft messages, stories, and information that people will share. It’s an excellent guide for leveraging social influence and word of mouth in branding strategies.
6. “Brand New: The Shape of Brands to Come” by Wally Olins: Olins provides a visionary outlook on the future of branding, covering how global dynamics, technology, and consumer behavior shape brand strategies. It’s a forward-thinking guide that prepares marketers for the evolving landscape of branding.
7. “Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die” by Chip Heath and Dan Heath: This book explores the traits of ideas that stick and how to apply these principles to make your brand messages memorable. It’s invaluable for crafting compelling narratives that elevate your brand.
8. “Designing Brand Identity: An Essential Guide for the Whole Branding Team” by Alina Wheeler: Wheeler’s book is a comprehensive guide to the entire branding process, from research and strategy to design and implementation. It’s an essential handbook for anyone involved in building or managing a brand.
9. “Eat Your Greens: Fact-Based Thinking to Improve Your Brand’s Health” by Wiemer Snijders: A collection of essays from thought leaders in marketing and advertising, offering evidence-based insights on a wide range of topics. It’s a thought-provoking read that challenges conventional wisdom and promotes a more analytical approach to branding.
10. “Decoded: The Science Behind Why We Buy” by Phil Barden: This book looks into the psychology of consumer decision-making, providing a scientific framework for understanding how and why people make purchase decisions. It’s crucial for marketers looking to align their brand strategies with consumer behaviors.

Throughout my career in advertising, I always thought my agency needed to pitch and win every client we could. When I went out on my own to start a new company, my instincts were to grow as big and fast as possible. In both cases, I was wrong. If someone had told me to stay small and grow slowly, I would have ignored them. I now realize that growing smaller is likely the right approach 99% of the time.

Today’s marketing landscape is saturated with messages screaming for attention and immediate transactions or sales, making it increasingly difficult for brands to stand out and maintain meaningful connections with their customers. Most brands focus on casting the widest net possible while appearing authentic. The underlying strategy is to grow at all costs, which seems to be the case in virtually all markets and industries, both B2B and B2C.

Customer Familiarity vs. Customer Intimacy

Data is cheap and readily available these days. What you do with your access to that data is often the more challenging task. Within minutes, anyone can easily set up a targeting media campaign hyperfocused on a select group of people who share not only demographic features but also psychographic and psychological characteristics, such as values, desires, goals, interests, and lifestyle choices.

Given my recent entrepreneurial adventures, I’ve started embracing a more nuanced marketing strategy. One that emphasizes the value of staying small while concentrating on a core group of loyal customers and exercising patience in growth initiatives. This new strategy focuses on leveraging the strength of more intimate marketing relationships and the benefits of narrowly focused branding efforts to forge stronger, more personal connections with consumers.

One of the biggest lessons I learned from being in the service business (either in the agency world or a company with customers who require a lot of support) is that “not every potential customer is a right fit for a business” (Godin, 2009). It almost seems counterintuitive to advocate for strategic diminution in scale and selective consumer targeting, a concept best represented by the phrase “growing smaller and selling less.” This approach goes against traditional growth metrics, prioritizing the depth of customer engagement over breadth. Accepting this as a foundational truth, I could write a very good case study on how a company can get this wrong.

Remaining small allows brands to maintain a laser focus on their mission and core values, fostering an authentic identity that resonates deeply with a targeted audience. This approach enables businesses to adapt swiftly to market changes and customer feedback, ensuring they remain relevant and competitive. It contradicts the traditional growth trajectory of expanding customer bases and product lines in favor of deepening value and satisfaction for existing customers.

Focusing on a smaller customer base with deeper loyalty can become more profitable. Companies with deeper brand loyalties might be best served by serving their customers better. Evidence shows that a modest increase in customer retention—merely 5%—can precipitate a profit surge of at least 25%, further proving the inefficiency of broad-spectrum customer acquisition strategies (Reichheld, 1996). This insight underscores the economic rationale for a concentrated customer focus, advocating for an optimized allocation of resources toward the most lucrative segments of the consumer base.

By treating each customer individually, brands can create customized experiences that foster loyalty and advocacy. Godin advocates for the “smallest viable market” concept, emphasizing the importance of focusing on a narrow audience that shares the brand’s values. This approach ensures that growth when it happens, is sustainable and aligned with the brand’s core identity.

Economic Rationalization of Narrowed Focus

Contrary to conventional growth strategies aimed at market share expansion, the “Grow Smaller” approach champions cultivating a smaller, though profoundly loyal, customer base. Kevin Kelly (2008) highlighted this concept in his “1,000 True Fans” theory, suggesting that a compact group of dedicated customers can sustain a business. “A thousand customers is a whole lot more feasible to aim for than a million fans. Millions of paying fans is not a realistic goal to shoot for, especially when you are starting out. But a thousand fans is doable. You might even be able to remember a thousand names. If you added one new true fan per day, it’d only take a few years to gain a thousand. “(Kelly, 2008). This approach is appealing due to its potential to reduce marketing and customer acquisition expenditures while simultaneously enhancing product and service personalization, augmenting customer satisfaction and brand loyalty.

Patience in growth plans is important for brands that prioritize long-term success over immediate results. Strategic patience involves setting realistic goals, investing in quality over quantity, and building a solid foundation of loyal customers who are deeply aligned with the brand’s values and vision. Loyal customers will become the cornerstone of a sustainable business growth plan. They not only provide consistent revenue but also serve as brand ambassadors and sources of transparent feedback. Focusing on these loyal customers involves understanding their needs and preferences at a granular level, often facilitated by CRM systems that track customer interactions and purchasing patterns.

Strategic Implementation

Operationalizing this strategy necessitates a granular understanding of the target consumer demographic, achievable through data analytics encompassing customer preferences, behaviors, and feedback. Implementing Customer Relationship Management (CRM) systems is extremely important in this context, facilitating tailored marketing and product development strategies. “One to one marketing means being willing and able to change your behavior toward an individual customer based on what the customer tells you and what else you know about that customer. (Peppers & Rogers, 1997)”

Social media and community engagement initiatives have become important tools for fostering customer loyalty and advocacy, further embedding the brand within the consumer’s identity. Brian Solis, Digital Analyst and Author, states, “Social media is about sociology and psychology more than technology. It’s the CRM that the customer is in control of.” From this perspective, we focus on understanding and catering to the human element of business, recognizing that in today’s digital age, customers have more control over the relationship than ever before.

Branding and Marketing Implications

This strategic pivot towards selectivity necessitates a reevaluation of branding and marketing practices. Traditional broad-spectrum messaging gives way to nuanced, highly targeted communication strategies, enhancing brand authenticity and resonance with the target demographic. As Pulizzi (2012) contends, the efficacy of content marketing is contingent upon a focused approach, underscoring the superiority of depth over breadth in audience engagement.

This approach prioritizes customer engagement depth, advocating for a resource allocation strategy that maximizes customer lifetime value. The implications for branding and marketing are profound, necessitating a shift towards more personalized and targeted communication strategies. This approach promises enhanced economic efficiency and aligns with a sustainable and ethically responsible business ethos. As such, it presents a compelling model for future business strategies in an increasingly saturated market environment.

“Instead of wondering when your next vacation is, maybe you should set up a life you don’t need to escape from.” Although not directly about branding, this quote by Seth Godin can be interpreted in the context of branding as the importance of creating a brand so targeted and aligned with its audience that it becomes an integral part of their lifestyle, rather than just another option in a sea of choices.

Sources
Godin, S. (2009). Tribes: We Need You to Lead Us. Portfolio.
Kelly, K. (2008). “1,000 True Fans.” The Technium.
Peppers, D., & Rogers, M. (1997). Enterprise One to One: Tools for Competing in the Interactive Age. Currency Doubleday.
Pulizzi, J. (2012). Content Inc.: How Entrepreneurs Use Content to Build Massive Audiences and Create Radically Successful Businesses. McGraw-Hill Education.
Reichheld, F. (1996). “The Loyalty Effect: The Hidden Force Behind Growth, Profits, and Lasting Value.” Harvard Business School Press.

Adopting and developing a brand model provides structure and direction to branding activities. It ensures strategic focus, guides investment in high-impact initiatives, fosters innovation, guarantees consistency across touchpoints, enables effective measurement and evaluation, and aligns internal stakeholders. Most of all, it serves as a blueprint for your marketing and brand campaigns. However, not all models are created equal.

The complexity of today’s marketing and branding ecosystem requires a model that encapsulates the traditional branding elements, such as identity, value proposition, and consumer engagement and integrates the interconnected nature of digital channels, consumer co-creation, and global market trends. While successful in their right, the existing models often fall short of capturing this holistic view, leaving companies with a fragmented understanding of their brand’s role in a larger ecosystem.

The Limitations of Old Models for Branding

I’ve spent most of my career looking for ways to simplify the development of creative, marketing, and branding efforts. In studying the various brand models created over the past century, I’ve come to understood their strengths and limitations. These models have provided general frameworks that guide brands in creating, managing, and evaluating their identity and positioning in the marketplace. They offer structured pathways for understanding brand essence, consumer perception, and the strategic execution of marketing efforts. However, despite their contributions to the field of marketing and branding, I’ve observed a significant gap: none of these models offer a comprehensive view of the entire marketing and branding ecosystem.

Furthermore, I’ve seen widespread misunderstandings about these models among non-marketers. These individuals often find the concepts abstract and removed from the practical realities of running a business. This disconnect stems not from a lack of interest or relevance but from the models’ inability to translate complex marketing theories into actionable insights that resonate across different functions of a business. As a result, there’s a critical gap in knowledge and application of these frameworks among those who could benefit from them the most.

Compounding this issue, many companies, perhaps overwhelmed by these models’ perceived complexity or theoretical nature, tend to ignore structured approaches altogether. Instead, they focus on discrete tasks and activities, mistaking motion for progress. While productive in the short term, this task-oriented mindset lacks the strategic cohesion and direction that a well-structured brand model can provide. Without this strategic foundation, efforts become disjointed, opportunities for synergy are missed, and the brand’s potential impact is diluted.

A New Model for Branding

I am a strong advocate for developing and adopting a more integrated brand model that reflects the multifaceted reality of modern marketing and branding. Such a model would serve as a navigational tool for marketers and demystify the branding process for non-marketers, fostering a deeper, organization-wide understanding of the brand’s strategic role. Moreover, by encouraging a structured approach to branding efforts, companies can move beyond the limitations of task-oriented thinking to achieve coherent, strategic, and impactful brand engagement across all touchpoints of the marketing and branding ecosystem.

Recognizing the limitations of existing brand models and the need for a more holistic approach that resonates across all organizational levels, an Adaptive Brand Ecosystem is beneficial and essential for modern businesses. Here are key reasons why developing a new brand model is crucial:

Dynamic Interactions: Unlike traditional linear models of brand-consumer interactions, an Adaptive Brand Ecosystem emphasizes the multidirectional exchanges between a brand, its consumers, competitors, and the wider cultural and economic contexts. These interactions are continuously evolving, influenced by and influencing the ecosystem at large.

Evolutionary Adaptation: Brands within this ecosystem must adapt to survive and thrive in response to changing external pressures, such as shifts in consumer behavior, technological advancements, and competitive movements. This adaptation is reactive, responding to immediate changes and anticipatively preparing for future shifts.

Integrated Touchpoints: Communication and engagement with consumers are seamlessly integrated across multiple platforms and touchpoints, ensuring consistent and coherent brand experiences. This integration is vital for building and maintaining trust and loyalty within the ecosystem.

Customer-Centricity: At the heart of the Adaptive Brand Ecosystem is a deep focus on understanding and meeting consumers’ evolving needs and desires. Brands that succeed in this ecosystem are genuinely committed to delivering value and relevance to their consumers.

Sustainability and Ethical Responsibility: Recognizing the interconnectedness of all ecosystem components, successful adaptive brands prioritize sustainability and ethical considerations in their operations, product development, and marketing strategies. This not only addresses consumer demand for responsible brands but also ensures the long-term viability of the ecosystem itself.

Implications for Brand Strategy:

Agility and Flexibility: Brands must cultivate organizational agility to respond to ecosystem changes quickly. This includes flexible business models, adaptive marketing strategies, and an openness to innovation.

Continuous Learning and Innovation: Ongoing research and engagement with consumers, competitors, and technological trends are crucial for anticipating and initiating change within the ecosystem.

Collaborative Networks: Building and maintaining collaborative networks with other entities within the ecosystem can enhance innovation, extend brand reach, and foster resilience.

Authentic Engagement: Authenticity in brand messaging, values, and actions is key to building trust and loyalty within the ecosystem. Brands must ensure their actions align with their stated values and promises to consumers.

The Evolution of Brand Marketing Models

The proposed Adaptive Brand Ecosystem model represents a significant leap forward in our understanding of branding in the 21st century. It recognizes that brand success is no longer dictated by linear processes but by the ability to adapt and thrive within a constantly evolving environment. This new model underscores the importance of agility, continuous learning, collaborative networks, and authenticity in crafting brand strategies that resonate with contemporary consumers. By adopting such an approach, companies can ensure that their branding efforts are coherent and strategic and deeply attuned to the fluid nature of consumer preferences and market dynamics.

Brands that embrace this holistic, adaptive approach will be better positioned to forge deeper connections with their audience, innovate successfully, and achieve sustainable growth in the years to come.

Questions About the Adaptive Brand Ecosystem Model

Throughout history, brand marketing has continually adapted to new technologies and shifts in consumer preferences. From simple marks of craftsmanship to complex digital campaigns, brand marketing has become a fundamental aspect of business strategy, aiming to build brand equity, loyalty, and a strong emotional connection with consumers. As consumer preferences change, so must our methods of building relationships with them.

Over the past few years, I’ve been exploring different models for brand marketing, looking for unique and memorable ways to stand out in a marketplace where nearly every organization is looking to build customer relationships.  Brand marketing, in various forms, has been around for centuries, evolving significantly over time to adapt to changes in consumer behavior, technology, and market conditions. Branding dates back to ancient times when artisans would mark their goods to signify their origin and quality. However, the more modern concept of brand marketing, focused on creating a distinct brand identity and building relationships with consumers, is more of a product of the modern industrial society.

Brand Marketing Models

To help create a new model for brand marketing, I think it’s important to understand the models and methods of those brand thought leaders have given us over the years.  Many of us already use these methods and approaches but probably don’t know where they originated. While not a complete list of all the leaders in the field, these authors represent the most influential approaches to marketing this century – including a short summary of their contributions.

Marketing Myopia (Theodore Levitt, 1960)

Theodore Levitt revolutionized the marketing field with his concept of Marketing Myopia. He challenged businesses to broaden their vision of their industries to avoid a narrow focus on selling products. Levitt argued that companies should concentrate on customer needs and adapt to changing markets rather than being product-centric. This perspective encourages organizations to redefine their missions, focus on sustainable growth, and innovate continuously to meet the evolving demands of consumers.

Marketing Management (Philip Kotler, 1967)

Kotler’s work laid out foundational marketing concepts such as the marketing mix (Product, Price, Place, Promotion), which became crucial tools for marketers in planning and implementing effective marketing strategies. He also stressed the importance of market research, data analysis, and the continuous evaluation of marketing efforts to ensure alignment with changing consumer preferences and market conditions. Kotler as been a prolific author over the years, publishing several books on marketing, which discuss the topics of Holistic Marketing, Social Marketing, Concept of Segmentation, Targeting, and Positioning (STP), Marketing Management, Customer Lifetime Value (CLV), and the importance of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Ethical Marketing.

Brand Equity (Kevin Lane Keller, 1993)

Keller’s brand equity model focuses on the importance of consumer knowledge about a brand. He proposed that brand equity is built through brand awareness, brand associations, perceived quality, and brand loyalty. This framework highlights how consumers’ thoughts and feelings about a brand influence its success. Keller’s Customer-Based Brand Equity (CBBE) Model is a framework that outlines how to build a strong brand. It suggests that brand strength is based on four levels of brand development: brand identity (who are you?), brand meaning (what are you?), brand responses (what about you?), and brand relationships (what about you and me?). This model emphasizes developing a deep, meaningful relationship with consumers. Keller also introduced the Brand Resonance Model, which provides a detailed approach to achieving brand resonance, where consumers have a deep, psychological bond with the brand. It outlines a series of steps that brands should aim for, starting from ensuring brand identity to creating intense, active loyalty.

Brand Asset Valuator (Young & Rubicam, 1993)

The Brand Asset Valuator (BAV) model assesses a brand’s strength in the market based on four key dimensions: differentiation (the brand’s distinctiveness), relevance (the brand’s importance to consumers), esteem (how well the brand is regarded), and knowledge (how familiar and intimate consumers are with the brand). It’s a tool to measure a brand’s current and future value. The Brand Asset Valuator model asserts that these dimensions interact to build brand equity. A strong brand starts by being differentiated, which makes it relevant. As the brand proves itself over time, it gains esteem. With sustained esteem and relevance, consumers become more knowledgeable about the brand. This model guides strategic marketing decisions, tracks brand health over time, and compares a brand’s strength against competitors.

Brand Identity System (David Aaker, 1996)

Aaker introduced the Brand Identity System, emphasizing the importance of a brand’s identity in its marketing efforts. He outlined that brand identity consists of a core identity and an extended identity, which includes brand essence, brand values, and personality traits. His framework provides a structured approach to defining and managing a brand’s identity across four dimensions. The first dimension, Brand as Product, focuses on the tangible aspects of the product, including its attributes, quality, and users. The second, Brand as Organization, emphasizes the organization’s culture, values, and operational strategy. The third, Brand as Person, assigns human personality traits to the brand, influencing its communication and consumer engagement. Finally, the Brand as Symbol dimension encompasses the brand’s visual elements, such as logos and visual identity, which enhance recognition and foster emotional connections.

Marketing Holism (Philip Kotler, 2000)

Philip Kotler introduced the concept of Marketing Holism, underscoring the necessity of an integrated and holistic approach to marketing. He advocated that marketing should not be seen as a series of discrete actions or tactics but as a comprehensive system where every aspect, from product development to customer service, is interconnected. Kotler’s emphasis on creating a seamless consumer experience across all touchpoints changed how businesses approach marketing strategy, ensuring that each element works together to support the overall brand promise and meet consumer needs.

The holistic marketing concept is organized around four main components: Integrated Marketing: Ensures that all forms of communication and messages are carefully linked together, maintaining consistency across all marketing channels. Internal Marketing: Emphasizes the importance of internal processes and employee engagement as integral to delivering customer satisfaction. Relationship Marketing: Focuses on building long-term relationships with customers, stakeholders, and other partners to foster loyalty and repeat business. Socially Responsible Marketing: Recognizes the importance of social and ethical considerations in marketing practices, including the impact on the environment, society, and cultural norms.

Brand Resonance Model (Kevin Lane Keller, 2001)

The Brand Resonance Model builds on the concept of brand equity, outlining a pyramid of steps leading to brand resonance, where consumers have a deep, psychological bond with the brand. It starts with ensuring brand identity (who are you?), followed by creating meaningful brand meaning (what are you?), eliciting positive brand responses (what about you?), and culminating in brand resonance (what about you and me?). The Brand Resonance Model, a component of the CBBE Model, specifically focuses on the ultimate relationship and level of identification that a consumer has with the brand. It is depicted as a pyramid with four levels, each building upon the last: Brand Salience, Brand Performance and Brand Imagery, Brand Judgments and Brand Feelings, and Brand Resonance. The Brand Resonance Model is essentially a detailed view of the last step of the CBBE Model (Brand Relationships), detailing how to achieve intense, active loyalty and attachment between the consumer and the brand. It emphasizes the importance of not just being known, but being loved and integrated into the consumer’s lifestyle and identity.

Blue Ocean Strategy (W. Chan Kim and Renée Mauborgne, 2004)

Though not exclusively a branding theory, the Blue Ocean Strategy is influential in marketing because it advocates that businesses can succeed not by battling competitors but by creating “blue oceans” of uncontested market space. It encourages brands to innovate and create new demand, making the competition irrelevant. Red Oceans represent all the industries today, where companies fiercely compete for market share, and the boundaries of industries are defined and accepted. The competitive space is crowded, prospects for growth are reduced, and profits are slim. Blue Oceans, conversely, represent all the industries not in existence today – the unknown market space, untainted by competition. In Blue Oceans, demand is created rather than fought over.

Cultural Branding (Douglas Holt, 2004)

Holt argues that the most iconic brands achieve their status by acting as cultural innovators. They craft a brand myth that addresses societal tensions and desires, positioning the brand as a symbol within cultural movements. This approach sees brands as playing a role in cultural narratives and movements, creating deep emotional connections with consumers. Unlike traditional branding strategies that focus on functional benefits or emotional connections, Cultural Branding emphasizes the role of brands in fulfilling societal myths and addressing cultural tensions. Brands like Harley-Davidson, Apple, and Nike have successfully employed cultural branding strategies.

The Golden Circle (Simon Sinek, 2009)

Sinek’s Golden Circle theory posits that successful brands communicate by starting with “Why” (their purpose, cause, or belief), then explaining “How” (the process or values that differentiate them), and finally “What” (the product or service they offer). This approach aims to inspire and attract customers who share the brand’s beliefs. The Golden Circle model suggests that when organizations and leaders articulate and lead with their “Why,” they attract customers and employees who share their fundamental beliefs, creating a strong, loyal following. This is not just about transactional relationships but about forming connections on a belief level, leading to more profound and lasting success.

What’s Next in Brand Marketing

“Purpose often fails. But perhaps it is so hard to fix because this failure can come in many shapes and sizes. Purpose can fail when a brand reaches too high and tries to build a purpose that is too lofty. Here, purpose becomes the ever-feared fluff.” (Meggan Wood, Forbes Councils Member)

While countless books on marketing have been published since Sinek’s profoundly influential book Start With Why, we haven’t been introduced to any new concepts that deliver such an effective, albeit simple, new framework or model we can apply to the modern marketing ecosystem. Drawing inspiration from the great minds in branding that have come before, this is where we start to ask the question: What comes after purpose?

The answer lies in the “Adaptive Brand Ecosystems” concept, an approach that merges Aaker’s structural insights and Sinek’s purpose-driven philosophy with a strategy fit for the digital age.

Adaptive Brand Ecosystems propose a new paradigm where brands are not just purposeful entities but living, breathing organisms that adapt, engage, and evolve within their environments. Here, the brand’s essence is fluid, shaped by interactions, technological advancements, and a genuine commitment to ethical responsibility, promising a revolutionary way to connect with consumers on a level that goes beyond traditional marketing narratives.

David Aaker, often cited as the father of modern branding, introduced the concept of brand personality in his book “Building Strong Brands.” His model focuses on developing a brand as a complex entity with a distinct personality, much like a human, including traits, culture, and values. This approach is pivotal in creating deep, emotional connections with consumers. Aaker also emphasized the significance of brand equity, consisting of brand loyalty, awareness, perceived quality, and brand associations, which contribute to the value offered by a product or service.

Simon Sinek, on the other hand, introduced a simple yet profound model for inspirational leadership and marketing, encapsulated in his Golden Circle theory. He argues that successful organizations start with a clear understanding of “Why” they exist, before moving on to “How” they do what they do, and finally “What” it is they do. This “Why” centers on the purpose, cause, or belief that drives every organization. Sinek’s approach has been highly influential in purpose-driven marketing, suggesting that consumers connect more deeply with brands that have a clear, altruistic purpose beyond just profit.

Merging Aaker’s and Sinek’s perspectives offers a compelling framework for modern brand marketing. While Aaker provides the structure for building brand identity and equity, Sinek injects the soul, emphasizing the importance of starting with a purpose. However, as we explore new territories in branding, there’s an opportunity to go beyond purpose-driven marketing.

The next evolution could involve what might be termed “Adaptive Brand Ecosystems.” This concept suggests that brands should not only know their foundational purpose (Sinek’s “Why”) and have a strong, character-driven identity (Aaker’s model) but also must be adaptive, flexible, and responsive to their environment. This involves:

1. Dynamic Engagement: Brands should constantly learn from interactions across various touchpoints, adapting messaging, and strategies in real-time based on consumer behavior and feedback.
2. Co-creation with Consumers: Moving beyond traditional engagement, brands should foster environments where consumers contribute to the brand’s evolution, creating a more personal and invested relationship.
3. Sustainability and Ethical Responsibility: In a time increasingly defined by social challenges, a brand’s commitment to sustainability and ethical practices becomes part of its core identity and purpose.
4. Technological Integration: Utilizing AI, machine learning, and other technologies not just for marketing efficiency, but to enhance the customer experience and create new ways for consumers to interact with the brand.

In this framework, brands are seen as living entities within their ecosystems, constantly evolving based on external pressures and internal innovations. This approach can create deeper, more resilient consumer connections, ensuring long-term relevance and loyalty. It’s a blend of maintaining a strong, attractive brand identity and personality while being genuinely purpose-driven and adaptable to the rapidly changing world.

The concept of an “Adaptive Brand Ecosystem” represents a modern approach to branding that acknowledges the complex, dynamic nature of today’s business environment. This approach suggests that brands must evolve from being static entities with unidirectional messaging to becoming more like living ecosystems that adapt and respond to their environments.  Like the brand and marketing models that came before, I am currently working on a visualization model to help simplify this new approach.